estøkad

— vs directus

For the buyer where the answer to jurisdiction matters.

Directus is excellent at one specific thing: a generic database-on-Postgres tool that gives content teams a CMS-like surface over their existing schema. Real-time API is strong; the asset library is well-modelled. The wedge against Directus for our buyer profile is the same as the wedge against any US-headquartered platform: jurisdiction, DORA evidence, and the legal residency of the vendor itself.

How they differ

CriterionDirectusEstøkad
PositioningDatabase-on-Postgres tooling that doubles as a CMSHeadless CMS for regulated buyers
HeadquartersDirectus is incorporated in the US (Brooklyn, NY) with a remote-first team. EU operations exist but the legal entity is US-domiciled.Tallinn, Estonia — Samarkand Industries OÜ
Per-country residencySelf-host or Directus Cloud regions (US + EU)6 EU + Switzerland regions, customer-chosen
Audit chainActivity logs; not cryptographically chainedHash-chained with daily Merkle roots
DORA evidence packNot a product featureAuto-generated, downloadable
Schema authoringVisual collection editor; introspects existing Postgres schemasTypeScript-first defineType() + visual builder; schemas live in Git
Real-time + websocketsStrong — first-class real-time APIWebSocket sync for editor presence; not the headline real-time vendor
Asset libraryBuilt-in DAM with strong asset-relations modellingimgproxy-backed asset pipeline; Bunny CDN for variants
Approval workflowsFlows + permissions; configurable but not preset-shippedFour-eyes approval workflow built into the publish path
Pricing modelSelf-host free; Cloud from $99/mo (≈€92/mo)€499/mo Studio managed; €1,699/mo Regulated

Where Directus is still better

Real-time + WebSocket APIs as a first-class concept; Directus has been investing there for years. Asset-library data modelling is mature and battle-tested. Their self-host story is a clean fit for teams who already operate Postgres and want a UI on top of an existing schema. Open-source community is active.

Where Estøkad wins

EU-domiciled vendor; Directus is US-headquartered. Per-country residency at the customer's choice rather than a multi-region selector. DORA evidence pack as a product feature. Approval workflows + field-level RBAC at the Regulated tier. The buyer profile we serve will not pick a US-headquartered vendor for regulated surfaces; that's the constraint.

Same Postgres underneath. Different jurisdiction on top.

See pricing →