— vs storyblok
Storyblok built the strongest visual editor in the headless market. They are EU- headquartered, which matters. What they do not do is country-level residency, DORA evidence packs, or schema-as-code at the level a Sanity team expects. Estøkad covers Storyblok's wedge and adds the three things their roadmap does not.
| Criterion | Storyblok | Estøkad |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Linz, Austria | Brussels, Belgium |
| Data residency | Frankfurt, Virginia, Sydney | Per country: BE, FR, DE, NL, LU, CH |
| DORA evidence pack | Not a product feature | Auto-generated, downloadable |
| Audit log | Activity log, not hash-chained | Hash-chained, daily Merkle root |
| Schema as code | Component schema in JSON | TypeScript-first defineType() |
| Visual editing | Strong — their headline feature | Same overlay protocol, equivalent quality |
| Reference graph | Stories and components | Spaces, types, locales, cross-space references |
| Engineering ergonomics | GUI-first | Code-first or GUI-first |
| Pricing model | Volume tiers (traffic + entries) | Platform fee plus à la carte modules |
Visual edit polish refined over six years. A component library ecosystem with hundreds of contributors. Stronger mid-market name recognition in DACH and the UK. If your only requirement is in-page editing for marketers, Storyblok is a defensible choice.
Country-level residency Storyblok cannot host outside Frankfurt. A DORA evidence pack with a cryptographically chained audit log. Schema-as-code parity with Sanity in the same product. Cross-space references for corporate groups with multiple brands under one parent — the multi-brand corporate-group shape.
Visual edit and schema-as-code. One product.
See pricing →